Three bugs this time: indent seems to be unable to handle function pointers properly, comments after (goto) labels are off-by-one and the info page has a tab...
Current indent in woody is 2.2.4-1, could you please try it and tell me whether this bug reproduces or not? Thanks.
Yes the off-by-one for comments after (non-case) labels reproduces,
the documentation thingie seems to be fixed and the rather inconsistent
indentation of
int binpuu_fd_delete (
void (*p_del_f)(void *),
int (*p_ver_f)(const void *, const void *),
const void *p_d_os,
binpuu_fd *p_puu_os)
to
int binpuu_fd_delete(
void (*p_del_f) (void *),
int (*p_ver_f) (const void *, const void *),
const void *p_d_os, binpuu_fd * p_puu_os)
is still there... retitle s/ & docs //1 ? ;)
Hello. I've received this from the Bug system. [ Save the tab in the info page which has been fixed, everything reproduces in indent 2.2.4 ]. [ Please keep the Cc: lines when replying ]. Thanks. Package: indent Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: normal Three bugs this time: indent seems to be unable to handle function pointers properly, comments after (goto) labels are off-by-one and the info page has a tab...
Hello. In Debian Bug #63551 (please keep the Cc: lines if possible), Tuomas Heino <iheino@cc.hut.fi> reported (among many other things), that when using -t and -ts there are off-by-one errors: As an example, consider this sample.c label: /* Comment */ indent -c 15 -ts100 sample.c gives: label: /* Comment */ but the comment starts at column 14, not 15. I can still reproduce this using indent-2.2.7. Thanks.
... Hi, please note that 2.2.7 was a maintainer-switch release; it hardly contains bug fixes. However, the reported bugs have been past on to the new maintainer. The old maintainer,