#647190 /etc/exim4/conf.d/router/???_*: have a uniform header

Package:
exim4-config
Source:
exim4
Submitter:
Regid Ichira
Date:
2011-11-06 08:45:06 UTC
Severity:
minor
#647190#5
Date:
2011-10-31 14:31:27 UTC
From:
To:
  With
    $ sed -sn '2,3p' /etc/exim4/conf.d/router/???_*
    ### router/100_exim4-config_domain_literal
    #################################
    # router/150_exim4-config_hubbed_hosts
    #################################
    ### router/200_exim4-config_primary
    #################################
    ### router/300_exim4-config_real_local
    #################################
    ### router/400_exim4-config_system_aliases
    #################################
    ### router/500_exim4-config_hubuser
    #################################
    ### router/600_exim4-config_userforward
    #################################
    procmail:
      debug_print = "R: procmail for $local_part@$domain"
    ### router/800_exim4-config_maildrop
    #################################
    ### router/850_exim4-config_lowuid
    #################################
    ### router/900_exim4-config_local_user
    #################################
    ### router/mmm_mail4root
    #################################
one can see that 2 files in /etc/exim4/conf.d/router/ do not
maintain the uniform header.  I think other sections of the
split configuration also stick to the same header.
--- /etc/exim4/conf.d/router/700_exim4-config_procmail  2004-11-06 11:55:43.000000000 +0200
+++ 700_exim4-config_procmail   2011-10-31 16:03:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@

+### router/700_exim4-config_procmail
+#################################
+
 procmail:
   debug_print = "R: procmail for $local_part@$domain"
   driver = accept

--- /etc/exim4/conf.d/router/150_exim4-config_hubbed_hosts      2006-06-23 07:56:53.000000000 +0300
+++ 150_exim4-config_hubbed_hosts       2011-10-31 16:11:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@

-# router/150_exim4-config_hubbed_hosts
+### router/150_exim4-config_hubbed_hosts
 #################################

 # route specific domains manually.
#647190#10
Date:
2011-11-06 08:41:56 UTC
From:
To:
tag 647190 confirmed wontfix
thanks

Yes. The uniform headers are introduced when the file is touched
anyway. A conffile change causes prompts for a lot of users on package
installations, so we rather refrain from doing gratuitous changes in
comments.

I agree that having uniform headers is nice, but I also think that not
bothering users with dpkg-conffiles prompts during update for comment
changes is the more important things.

The uniform headers are going to be introduced when the files are
touched anyway for the next time.

Thanks for caring, and thanks for your patch.

Greetings
Marc