- Package:
- fontconfig
- Source:
- fontconfig
- Description:
- generic font configuration library - support binaries
- Submitter:
- Date:
- 2015-05-18 11:27:46 UTC
- Severity:
- minor
Hi, currently, the fonts in ttf-freefont report their variant (i.e. bold, italic, etc.) in Bulgarian language, e.g. $ fc-match FreeMono FreeMono.ttf: "FreeMono" "нормален" $ fc-match FreeMono:bold FreeMonoBold.ttf: "FreeMono" "получерен" Please note that this is independent of the locale set on the system. Curiously, there is also a German translation of these strings present in the sfd source file, but for whatever reason, the Bulgarian ones is prefered. - Fabian
Hi Fabian, I happened to be looking over the Debian bugs, and noticed this new report. I can confirm that fc-match returns the Bulgarian string, but this strikes me as an fc-match bug. This comes from a standard table of strings in the font, indexed by language. There is no further logic in the font, and I just double-checked: the strings all seem to be indexed correctly. This works properly for FreeMono with most software (e.g. on systems set up for German, the face names appear in German) My only clue is, fc-list FreeMono lists the Bulgarian string first *after* the main "en" string. (That's odd -- wouldn't Basque come first? Aha. It's sorting by ISO 639-3 language code, for which Basque is 'eus', and Bulgarian is 'bul'.) This is an fc-cache bug. (Please report further FreeFont related issues to https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=freefont)
reassign 662931 fontconfig 2.9.0-5 forwarded 662931 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27765 thanks Am 04.05.2012 10:34, schrieb Steve White: Indeed it is. It has been filed two years ago in the fontconfig bug tracker and got recently fixed by the following commit: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/commit/?id=7587d1c99d9476b6dd4dbe523c0204da700fed8d - Fabian
Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com> writes: Can I get someone to confirm that this is fixed in 2.9.0-5?
Am 25.07.2012 17:40, schrieb Keith Packard: The bug has been reassigned to fontconfig 2.9.0-5, i.e. it has been marked found in this specific version - not fixed. However, I can confirm that the bug is still present in the fontconfig package currently in unstable. - Fabian