Dear Maintainer, I have a package which ships a SINGLE html file containing a FAQ. If I use the "Files" field to indicate this file, then lintian complains that "doc-base-file-no-index" but if i use the "Index" field then "doc-base-file-lacks-required-field". Since it is a single file, I think it has no index, or it is itself its own index. So like in the case of .pdf files or so, the Index field shouldn't be required. Bye
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Sounds like Lintian is following the current specification here. """ Index: Index or top-level file for this document format. Only applies to document formats HTML and Info, and /required/ if the format is HTML or Info. """ [1] ~Niels [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/robert/doc-base.git;a=blob;f=doc/doc-base.sgml;h=fabde6b111621680ecfa5502bbb9e2124c2e6d9a;hb=36765232ee802317137e53600f6380735b36e9cc#l262 Tags/markup manually removed. Emphasis mine.
It sounds right, but what's the point of specifying both in case of just one file? It could be just assumed I guess. Do you think this should be moved to doc-base or just dropped? Bye
Not sure what the point might be. At first glance, your assertion looks reasonable (but I am not intimate with the doc-base spec and the implemenation of the "consumers"). If you want it changed, lets move this to doc-base. ~Niels
tags 706927 - moreinfo See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682436#10 for an example of a possible syntax (only "Files", "Index" forbidden) which could also help fixing that other bug. Also I think no more info is needed here, so removing that bug tag.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Let's try that again!