#711015 please do not print warnings during upgrades and do what ever it is automatically instead #711015
- Package:
- src:gdk-pixbuf
- Source:
- gdk-pixbuf
- Submitter:
- Date:
- 2020-12-06 13:06:18 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
Often during upgrades of other packages we are told to try gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache so we do, # gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache bash: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache: cannot overwrite existing file # gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >| /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache bash: gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders: command not found And we end up causing more damage than before. So can you please figure out a better way to do whatever it is that you want, without involving the system administrator.
# gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache bash: gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders: command not found 14:01 127 ~# dlocate gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:i386: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders 14:01 ~# /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache bash: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache: cannot overwrite existing file 14:02 1 ~# /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders >| /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache
Hi Michael and Emilio! Indeed I've stumbled upon this bug too, which causes (some?) gtk apps (gobby IIRC) to end up without icons for the toolbars. I realize that gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders is installed by libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev. But this means that in order to properly install an app I need a development package. Maybe /usr/bin/gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders should be splitted from libgdk- pixbuf2.0-dev and declared as a run time dependency (pre dependency I guess) for those packages that need to build the cache? I would say that this bug is important because undermines the usability of the apps, but I'll let you maintainers decide :) Kinds regards, Lisandro.