* Package name : qucs Version : 0.0.17 Upstream Author : Frans Schreuder <fransschreuder@gmail.com> * URL : http://qucs.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : Quite Universal Circuit Simulator Qucs is an integrated circuit simulator which means you are able to setup a circuit with a graphical user interface (GUI) and simulate the large-signal, small-signal and noise behaviour of the circuit. After that simulation has finished you can view the simulation results on a presentation page or window. Qucs was in Debian until Squeeze, but it had to be removed because it didn't compile with qt4 libs. Recently, upstream has released a qt4 based version, so I'm intending to include it in Debian again.
Hi José, regarding your ITP, do you think you will make it in time for Qucs to be included in jessie? Regards, Christian
Anything new since May? If not, I may tray to update the package for Jessie, if that's OK. I would setup a git repository in collab-maint for that purpose. No Qt knowledge on my side, however. If qucs enters unstable in the next ~four days it might land in Jessie.
I've just uploaded it to the archive. I haven't had time to fix a couple of lintian warning because of the deadline, but I think it's good enough to be in Debian. Finally I've totally removed adms from the sources because it needs some verilog files with a license that's not considered dfsg. I've been considering removing asco too because it's not in a good shape, but finally I've left it in the sources without compiling it to avoid introducing a bunch of dirty binaries in the package. Regards. José L. 2014-10-20 12:20 GMT+02:00 W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>:
Hi, I just saw this was written in October. As far as I can see, Qucs is not available in the Debian repository now. Is there anything holding it up? Which archive did you upload it too? I can see that there is a well maintained PPA for Ubuntu with packages in good state here: https://launchpad.net/~fransschreuder1/+archive/ubuntu/qucs Is there any reason why this package cannot enter Debian sid also soon. I'm impressed of how well Qucs has become. Best regards, Ruben
2015-02-21 12:46 GMT+01:00 Ruben Undheim <ruben.undheim@gmail.com>: Yes, the sources contain some files which license is not acceptable by Debian ftpmaster, so it has been rejected. Yes, it is not a pure technical question. The package was ready, working and lintian clean. It 's a licensing problem. There are a bunch of files (mainly models) with non-free licenses. I'm trying to clean them all, but qucs funcionality are being reduced. I'm trying to find a replacement to keep it all working. Of course, the ppa package you say it's still worse in terms of licensing. I had already removed the files I was sure that were not free, but ftpmasters found some others. Regards José L.
Hi José L, Thanks for giving detailed information! This explains it very well. Getting the licenses ok isn't always the easiest thing to do... I wish you good luck and I hope that we once again will see Qucs in the archive. Thanks a lot for the effort! Best regards, Ruben 2015-02-21 19:28 GMT+01:00 José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez <jredrejo@debian.org>:
Ruben 2015-02-21 20:11 GMT+01:00 Ruben Undheim <ruben.undheim@gmail.com>:
2015-02-21 20:15 GMT+01:00 Ruben Undheim <ruben.undheim@gmail.com>: mmm, yes but if we qucs to be able to use them, it should be moved from free to contrib section in the archive.
ok, so these models are such a crucial part of Qucs that they are "required for Qucs to either build or function" [1]. If they were just optional (more or less plugins like flashplugin-nonfree is for iceweasel), I believe it would be fine to keep Qucs in main, but that's maybe not the case. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html
Hi, any news since February?
Some questions for my understanding:
- Which are the non-free models in Qucs,
i.e. which files in the repository?
- Are they required to build and/or work qith Qucs?
Or are they optional?
- Is the github repository now the official one?
(It seems to have newer changes than the SF one.)
TIA!
It seems there has been some upstream progress with the issues. Also upstream seems to have at least some interest in a Debian package. See this mailing list post from march this year: https://sourceforge.net/p/qucs/mailman/message/34967589/
Hi Jose, any news,updates,improvements regarding your ITP ? https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qucs i just checked it. There i found package is not part of any Distribution ? Regards, Rajasekhar
Hi, Rajasekhar no. The licensing issues in some of the included files are not solved yet. 2016-08-25 16:01 GMT+01:00 RajasekharPonakala <rajasekhar@swecha.net>:
The license issues should be fixed for the next release version 0.0.19. The offending Verilog-A files have been removed. I am just waiting the CI build finish to upload the final tarball to https://sourceforge.net/projects/qucs/files/qucs/ The latest ADMS should also be cleared of offending files. I just sent an update to bug #501264 about ADMS. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501264 Please let us know how can we can help with lintian and other issues in the future. Feel free to file issues in: https://github.com/Qucs/qucs Regards, Guilherme
Hi, I started working on the qucs package - bringing in the newest version etc. (https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qucs) José: Do you remember which files caused the previous upload to be rejected by the FTP masters? I am wondering if they are still in there. Best regards, Ruben
Yes, there are still several files, vhdl mainly, whose license is not clear. El lun., 15 oct. 2018 a las 16:20, Ruben Undheim (<ruben.undheim@gmail.com>) escribió:
This is a message from the Lunarpages Internet Solutions E-Mail Security Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The original e-mail attachment "Payment.gz" is on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and has been replaced by this warning message. At Mon Sep 16 05:12:25 2019 the content scanner said: Lunarpages: Executable DOS/Windows programs are dangerous in email (anowai.exe) No programs allowed (anowai.exe) Please logon to baruwa.lunarpages.net to review the message with message id: 1i9pmQ-0007xO-ED.
Dear all. We have released qucsator-0.0.20 [1]. It has been part of qucs, but it is also being used without qucs. It will also work in combination with any statically linked (qt3, non-debian) build of qucs or some of its forks. I think it will be good to have qucsator in Debian. Please consider packageing it e.g. within the electronics team [2]. The qucs qt5 implementation is progressing, and it will still support qucsator as a simulator backend. cheers felix [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/qucs/files/qucs/0.0.20/qucsator-0.0.20.tar.gz [2] https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team
Hi Ruben, Are you still intending to package qucs? If not, I would like to take over ITP #714836. Going through the bug history, the verilog-A problem was fixed upstream in 0.0.19, and all 39 remaining .va files in the tree are under the GPL. I intend to use your work on salsa.debian.org/science-team/qucs as a starting point. I am not a DD, so I will need a sponsor, but otherwise I believe I can handle maintaining this package. Thanks, Michael Lloyd