Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? - Open nautilus - Go to a local folder - Display it in list view * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Put the mouse on the space between two columns header. * What was the outcome of this action? The mouse cursor shows arrows (<->) as if I could resize the columns, but trying to resize them has no effect. * What outcome did you expect instead? I expect to be able to resize the columns, as in previous versions of nautilus. (At lease, if it is a feature that the columns are nor resizeable anymore, then I expect the cursor not to show resizing arrows.) By the way, thanks for maintaining GNOME in Debian!
Hi, I couldn't reproduce this in 3.12.0-2. It seems to be ok Regards, Ludovic
Hi,
I recently installed nautilus 3.12.2 and the issue, although marked as
fixed in nautilus 3.12.0, is not really fixed.
Some nautilus columns, while in list view, can only be resized to the
left (i.e., reducing the size). Other columns cannot be resized at all.
The issue is problematic with long names (as shown in the attached
screenshot), and is much more problematic now that the Type column
provides no details, forcing the user to add the MIME Type column.
In some cases, resizing the window helps, but in some others (like Trash
and Search, which add a Location column), it's quite frustrating.
$ lsb_release -rd && apt-cache policy nautilus
Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (jessie)
Release: testing
nautilus:
Installed: 3.12.2-1
Candidate: 3.12.2-1
Version table:
*** 3.12.2-1 0
200 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3.8.2-3 0
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
I just found the related bug report from earlier last year: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693459 The issue seems related to avoiding horizontal scrollbar at all costs ---which probably means it won't be fixed, since GNOME developers know best (!).
Hey, it seems they are avoiding horizontal bars at all cost as said in a previous message. It behaves exactly as John said with 3.12.2-1 thanks regards Pedro
Hi Actually you are both true. I had resized the only column that was resizable because there was enough space to do so. (The filename column) Regards Ludovic