- Package:
- codeblocks
- Source:
- codeblocks
- Description:
- Code::Blocks integrated development environment (IDE)
- Submitter:
- Ove KÃ¥ven
- Date:
- 2013-12-21 23:03:04 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
After some upgrade, Code::Blocks no longer have an icon in the Gnome 3 dock and application list. (There's still an icon in the Alt-Tab popup.) Since the dock only shows icons and not program names, it's essentially invisible there, and I keep forgetting that it's there.
Hi Ove, at least for me, Code::Blocks still has icons in the Gnome 3 dock and the application list. I have pretty much the same setup as you (Debian testing, codblocks 12.11-3), so I don't see, what could cause the problem. Do you still experience the issue? And if so, could you specify, which upgrade(s) let the icons vanish? Best regards, Andreas
Den 21. des. 2013 16:50, skrev Andreas Cadhalpun: Well, I've looked into things a bit, and I think it has something to do with me running fglrx. For some reason, I think Gnome is using smaller fonts and icons when running fglrx than when running the open-source radeon driver. (The codeblocks icon is visible if I run the latter.) Not sure where I can adjust that. Regardless, I think codeblocks ought to have an icon that is visible regardless of what font/icon size Gnome prefers, don't you think?
Hi Ove, On 21.12.2013 21:27, Ove Kåven wrote: > Well, I've looked into things a bit, and I think it has something to > do with me running fglrx. For some reason, I think Gnome is using > smaller fonts and icons when running fglrx than when running the > open-source radeon driver. (The codeblocks icon is visible if I run > the latter.) Actually, I can confirm your observation on another machine with Radeon graphics card: When using the proprietary fglrx, Code::Blocks does not show an icon, but it is shown using the radeon driver. This is a weird bug, and it might be difficult to solve, because a non-free package is involved. > Not sure where I can adjust that. Regardless, I think codeblocks > ought to have an icon that is visible regardless of what font/icon > size Gnome prefers, don't you think? That should certainly be the case, but I don't understand why Gnome uses different fonts, depending on the video driver, or how that could lead to the icon not being displayed. Best regards, Andreas