#737070#5
Date:
2014-01-29 21:33:02 UTC
From:
To:
package: fonts-okolaks
version: 0.5-6
severity: important

Hi,

 In debian/rules, it calls fontforge and use .ff scripts as below.

 However, those .ff files are missing in fonts-okolaks source package
 now, probably caused by an accident with importing source to vcs.

 As a result,

henrich@hp:/tmp $ dpkg --contents fonts-okolaks_0.5-6_all.deb
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/share/doc/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/share/doc/fonts-okolaks/
-rw-r--r-- root/root      1251 2014-01-05 23:54 ./usr/share/doc/fonts-okolaks/changelog.Debian.gz
-rw-r--r-- root/root      1147 2014-01-05 23:50 ./usr/share/doc/fonts-okolaks/copyright
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/share/fonts/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/share/fonts/truetype/
drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2014-01-05 23:58 ./usr/share/fonts/truetype/okolaks/
-rw-r--r-- root/root     69424 2008-04-29 19:32 ./usr/share/fonts/truetype/okolaks/okolaks_gBold.ttf

 It contains only one .ttf.

 New upstream version provides just .ttf files instead of .std,
 so update will solve this issue.

#737070#10
Date:
2014-01-30 06:31:52 UTC
From:
To:
I wonder why they are now keeping the source code secret, that sounds
like it will cause issues with DFSG item 2. Could you ask upstream to
describe their development process so that we can find out if that is
the case?

#737070#17
Date:
2026-10-06 12:00:04 UTC
From:
To:
According to the font metadata, it is still produced by fontforge, so it
now lacks the source. I suggest to move back to 0.5.