#743303 RFH: pulseaudio -- PulseAudio sound server

#743303#5
Date:
2014-04-01 15:29:19 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

PulseAudio is a widely used sound server. According to popcon it is
present on ~60% of Debian installations [1]. Most of the time it just
works and no one notices its existence [2].
Less often it has issues and this is how the amount of bugs outgrew the
small team of PulseAudio maintainers (which basically had only one
active member for years). :-(

If you care about the sound system on Debian either because you have
issues with it to solve or because you would like to keep it working for
others as well, please consider helping the maintenance team a bit by
moving bugs forward or even joining the team.

Thanks,
Balint

[1] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=pulseaudio
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pulseaudio.html

#743303#10
Date:
2014-04-02 23:02:39 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

I've just subscribed to the list in response to this bug. I'd like to
help as my time permits. Please add me to the team in alioth, my
username is fsateler.

I've glanced at the bug list and it looks to me that many bugs have
not had any activity (maintainer or otherwise) in over 2 years. I
think bugs that are too old should be closed (with a ping first,
maybe) so that the bug list becomes useful again.

As time permits I will try to fix other bugs.

#743303#15
Date:
2014-04-03 07:50:22 UTC
From:
To:
Added you.

Go for it :)

Thanks!

#743303#20
Date:
2014-04-04 16:50:02 UTC
From:
To:
Thanks!

There are some bugs that are actualy feature requests. How should we
deal with those? Given the undermanned state of the team, I'm tempted
to close them with a suggestion to file it upstream, but that is not
very friendly. Perhaps I can forward the bug first and then close it.
I don't think keeping bugs we won't be acting upon open is a good use
of the BTS.

What do you think?

#743303#25
Date:
2015-02-17 06:21:23 UTC
From:
To:
Hello,

I thought I had already replied to this bug - I apologize if I emailed
someone directly on accident.

II use pulseaudio and infact use the bluetooth module all the time.

I'm interested to help out and gain a foot-hold into Debian development -
I'm a c++ developer of over 10 years (I'll admit I'm replying as I'm
heading to the source to see if its even my language) - but can generally
write anything.  Ah, as its C I shouldn't have any problem.

Are you still seeking help?  I have registered on Alioth previou/sly and
will request to join the team

If you need the help, and add me:  Where should I begin (aside from reading
all documentation in the vcs as well as upstream)?

Best,



*Richard B. Winters*

#743303#30
Date:
2015-02-17 11:56:16 UTC
From:
To:
reading
at the bug page and see if there is any bug you would be able to help. I
think there are a couple of new ones I haven't had the time to reply yet,
so if you could start there it would be great!

You need to subscribe to the team as well.

Also, you should probably check out the latest 6.0 release already on git
(I haven't been able to upload yet), and test it.

Saludos
Felipe Sateler

PS: these RFH bugs don't reach the maintainers by default :(. Good thing
you applied on alioth otherwise we would have missed this!

#743303#35
Date:
2021-08-17 04:29:36 UTC
From:
To:
Hello

I could help with this. Is this RFH still topical?

      - Tommi Höynälänmaa

#743303#40
Date:
2021-08-19 15:44:46 UTC
From:
To:
Hello

It turned out that pulseaudio is to be replaced by pipewire in the
future. Hence I withdraw from this project.

      - Tommi Höynälänmaa

#743303#45
Date:
2022-06-13 08:23:43 UTC
From:
To:
Hello,

I would like to help as my time permit too for this project.

I use debian since multiple year, and this is my first first time I want participate into the tracking part of a package.

I am not interested about pipewire and I want  continu to use pulseaudio. :)

Please add me to the team.
my username is borrougagnou.

#743303#52
Date:
2026-08-15 04:39:21 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

I’d like to help with Debian’s PulseAudio packaging on an ongoing basis,
potentially as a co-maintainer if that would be useful to the team.

I work professionally with audio systems and have been getting more
involved in Debian packaging. As a first concrete contribution, I tested
the proposed JACK2 Build-Depends change in Bug #1143540 against the current
PulseAudio Salsa packaging. I switched the build dependency from
libjack-dev to libjack-jackd2-dev, verified dpkg-checkbuilddeps, and
completed a full binary package build successfully on Debian 13 amd64 with
JACK 1.9.22 detected and pulseaudio-module-jack produced.

I’m happy to keep helping with bug triage, reproducing and testing fixes,
preparing packaging changes/MRs, and audio-integration issues around
JACK/ALSA/PipeWire. I can start with small, reviewable tasks and build
trust from there.

If the RFH is still current, I’d appreciate guidance on the most useful
next package-maintenance work to pick up.

Thanks,
Thomas Stephens
GitHub: https://github.com/tmsteph