#818138 RFP: hunspell-ie -- Interlingue dictionary for Hunspell

Package:
wnpp
Source:
wnpp
Submitter:
-скрыто- Алекса
Date:
2017-10-29 10:24:07 UTC
Severity:
wishlist
#818138#5
Date:
2016-03-14 06:16:05 UTC
From:
To:
* Package name    : hunspell-ie
  Version         : 0.5.0
  Upstream Author : Olga Smirnova <mistresssilvara@hotmail.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/Carmina16/hunspell-ie
* License         : Apache-2.0
  Description     : Interlingue dictionary for Hunspell


Interlingue [ie] hunspell dictionary and hyphenation patterns.
#818138#10
Date:
2016-03-14 07:04:20 UTC
From:
To:
I have no idea why people think this is a good idea. It isn't.

It's supposed to be like

hunspell-*: spellchecking dicts
hyphen-*: hyphenation patterns

there's stuff using hyphen but nbot hunspell, so by "hiding" it in hunspell-ie..

Of course, if xyou provide it in hunspell-ie apt and packages.d.o wil
show it but still.

Regards,

Rene
#818138#15
Date:
2016-03-14 20:18:43 UTC
From:
To:
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

It creates two binary packages with those names. What source package name do you propose than? It doesn't have much sense to have several source packages for a one language.
#818138#20
Date:
2016-03-17 10:06:07 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

Nah, that is ok. I was assuming you were mixing them both in hunspell-ie
(whci hepoele did in the past, for whatever reason).

Depends, on whether those are usuaually shipped tgether or not. If they are
released idependently it _does_ make sense to have two source packages..

But I was aiming more at the binary packages, which you clarified. No problem
for me remaining :)

Regards,

Rene
#818138#25
Date:
2016-06-05 13:04:23 UTC
From:
To:
??????

? ??????, ? ???? ?????????? ? ????, ??????



Hi

I'm Tabitha ,I want to share business with you
#818138#30
Date:
2016-07-26 09:29:34 UTC
From:
To:
2M USD donated to you. Contact: (grantproject1@onet.eu) for more details.