- Package:
- isenkram-cli
- Source:
- isenkram
- Submitter:
- Paul Wise
- Date:
- 2025-02-05 03:09:01 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
isenkram-lookup suggests gkrellm-thinkbat but I don't use gkrellm. isenkram-lookup suggests tpb but I use GNOME, which already supports the feature set of tpb.
[Paul Wise] While I agree that this is unfortunate, I have no idea how to avoid it without teaching isenkram about all packages and their relationship in Debian, a feature I believe isenkram should not have. Anyone got any ideas how to use the existing metadata in the package archive to do better choices?
That seems reasonable. fact that I don't have the dependencies installed should be enough to rule it out. Some plugins might use Enhances instead of Depends. $ apt-cache show gkrellm-thinkbat | grep -o 'role::[^ ,]*' role::plugin role::program $ apt-cache show gkrellm-thinkbat | grep Depends Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7), gkrellm (>= 2.0.0) I cannot think of any straight-forward way to avoid the tpb suggestion, a more complicated way might be to demote things not using the same uitoolkit:: tag as my current desktop, but there would still not be any way to know that tpb provides the same functionality as my desktop.
Hello, Good morning, We have gone through your samples from a partner and Here is our Order List. Please do bear in mind that we are very much in need of this order, quote your competitive prices. Kindly send the Order confirmation. Your early reply will be much appreciated. Best Regards, Maryanah Erwin. PT FINDORA INTERNUSA Jln Pahlawan 66 Kec. Arjawinangun 45162 CIREBON West-Java INDONESIA tel : +62 231 357334 fax: +62 231 357260 email: marketing@findora.com
I came across this AppStream XML example today, and it reminded me of
this request.
<component type="addon">
<id>org.kde.wacomtablet</id>
<extends>org.kde.systemsettings</extends>
<extends>org.kde.kded</extends>
[...]
</component>
Perhaps isenkram can be extended to use <extends> information to only
propose components of type "addon" if the system it extends is
installed? An idea to explore later, I guess. I am not sure if the
information is easily available for the isenkram client code.
(Sorry about the earlier email sent while editing by mistake)
That sounds like it could work.