#884224 debian-policy: please add CC-BY-3.0 to common licenses

Package:
debian-policy
Source:
debian-policy
Submitter:
Markus Koschany
Date:
2017-12-29 09:51:06 UTC
Severity:
wishlist
Blocked By:
Bug Title
885698

  77

Update and document criteria for inclusion in /usr/share/common-licenses

important stable testing unstable 3 months ago

#884224#5
Date:
2017-12-12 19:22:53 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
maintainers are allowed to reference them.

License: CC-BY-3.0
Source: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Example packages:
https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Creative_Commons_Attribution_unported_.28CC-BY.29_v3.0

Regards,

Markus

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/12/msg00209.html

#884224#10
Date:
2017-12-12 23:58:41 UTC
From:
To:
control: forcemerge 795402 -1
control: forcemerge 795402 884225

Hello,

Please check for pre-existing books!  Thanks.

#884224#21
Date:
2017-12-13 18:12:32 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

Markus Koschany wrote:

Seconded (for CC-SA-3.0 unported).  Seconded only for that license; I
don't mean this to imply that we have consensus to include the texts
of all Creative Commons licenses in base-files!

Thanks,
Jonathan

#884224#26
Date:
2017-12-27 21:54:41 UTC
From:
To:
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

license-count numbers:

CC-BY 1.0                 2
CC-BY 2.0                 3
CC-BY 2.5                11
CC-BY 3.0               165
CC-BY 4.0                28
CC-BY-SA 1.0              3
CC-BY-SA 2.0             44
CC-BY-SA 2.5             14
CC-BY-SA 3.0            285
CC-BY-SA 4.0             61

Looks like both CC-BY 3.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0 would warrant inclusion.  Note
that the regexes in license-count may not be perfect; I'm not completely
familiar with all the variations the CC licenses can take.