* Package name : gpxsee Version : 4.17 Upstream Author : Martin Tuma <tumic@cbox.cz> * URL : http://www.gpxsee.org/ * License : GPL3 Programming Lang: C++ Description : GPS log file viewer and analyzer that supports GPX, TCX, KML, FIT, IGC and NMEA files Features: - User-definable online maps. - Offline maps (OziExplorer maps and TrekBuddy maps/atlases). - Elevation, speed, heart rate, cadence, power and temperature graphs. - Support for multiple tracks in one view. - Support for POI files. - Print/export to PDF. - Full-screen mode. - Opens GPX, TCX, FIT, KML, IGC, NMEA and Garmin CSV files. GPXSee has no other dependencies than QT. There is already a Debian package at the projects OpenSUSE build service repository (https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:tumic:GPXSee/gpxsee) that can be used as the base for the "official" Debian package. GPXSee is part of the official OpenSUSE and Fedora repositories.
Hi, I'd like to see a GPXsee package in Debian, too. Is there any progress or a preliminary package that I could test? Regards, Tino
Hi, I'd like to see a GPXsee package in Debian, too. Is there any progress or a preliminary package that I could test? Regards, Tino
I have a fully working packaging, but for now cannot proceed due to upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue. Investigating a possible last resort workaround is on my todo list but not very high priority given the circumstances.
I have a fully working packaging, but for now cannot proceed due to upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue. Investigating a possible last resort workaround is on my todo list but not very high priority given the circumstances.
"upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue" ??! What the hell are you talking about?! The licensing of GPXSee is fully transparent which have been confirmed by the OpenSUSE and Fedora licensing teams that had no objections when adding GPXSee to their distributions (the licenses are since then checked with every version update). Today, almost every major distribution (as well as FreeBSD) with exception of Debian and its derivates includes GPXSee and not a single one of them had any problems with licensing. So please STOP spreading this FUD of "serious licensing issue"! Martin Tůma
"upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue" ??! What the hell are you talking about?! The licensing of GPXSee is fully transparent which have been confirmed by the OpenSUSE and Fedora licensing teams that had no objections when adding GPXSee to their distributions (the licenses are since then checked with every version update). Today, almost every major distribution (as well as FreeBSD) with exception of Debian and its derivates includes GPXSee and not a single one of them had any problems with licensing. So please STOP spreading this FUD of "serious licensing issue"! Martin Tůma
"upstream unwillingness to address a serious licensing issue" ??! What the hell are you talking about?! The licensing of GPXSee is fully transparent which have been confirmed by the OpenSUSE and Fedora licensing teams that had no objections when adding GPXSee to their distributions (the licenses are since then checked with every version update). Today, almost every major distribution (as well as FreeBSD) with exception of Debian and its derivates includes GPXSee and not a single one of them had any problems with licensing. So please STOP spreading this FUD of "serious licensing issue"! Martin Tůma
See also https://github.com/tumic0/GPXSee/issues/98 .