#896458 RFH: swi-prolog -- ISO/Edinburgh-style Prolog interpreter

#896458#5
Date:
2018-04-21 08:54:43 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

I'm looking for co-maintainers for the swi-prolog package, which is a
Prolog interpreter, written in C (core) and Prolog itself (most of its
libraries). SWI-Prolog is still under active development, especially
compared to other Prolog implementations (most of which are stalled
nowadays).

There is a kind of infrastructure built around it, which includes
additional libraries [libraries] (shipped as packages, currently 233
additional packages total) and some related tools and projects (e. g.,
swish [swish], which is a web-interface for Prolog development). As far
as I know Debian does not contain anything of it besides SWI-Prolog
itself. So, ideally I'd like it (the swi-prolog package and other
prospective packages from SWI-Prolog infrastructure) to be
team-maintained. Of course, currently such team do not exist, but in
case there are volunteers to help with, let's just start it.

Please, share your thoughts and ideas.

[libraries] http://www.swi-prolog.org/pack/list

[swish] https://swish.swi-prolog.org/

With regards,
Lev Lamberov

#896458#10
Date:
2018-04-21 12:43:15 UTC
From:
To:
Dear Lev,

Thank you for maintaining swi-prolog. It is very dear to my heart, being
one of the very first packages I maintained in Debian.


Best wishes,

#896458#15
Date:
2018-04-26 14:12:53 UTC
From:
To:
Hello Lev,

I am not using actually swi-prolog, I used it on university.

But, I would like to help you with the package.

Let me know, how could I help.

Regards!
Emmanuel <eamanu>

#896458#20
Date:
2020-01-05 09:20:53 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Emmanuel,

I've just accidentally opened this bug report (RFH for SWI-Prolog) and
found your message. There's a feature of Debian bug tracking systems: it
sends messages to a given package maintainer, and since the bug report
is filled for the wnpp virtual package and I'm not its maintainer (and I
was not explicitely CCed), I did not received your message.

Sorry for being so unresponsible! I should have checked the bug report
regularly or subscribe to it explicitely.

If you're still interested in helping with SWI-Prolog packaging fro
Debian, please, get in touch. And thank you for you kind willingness to
help.

With regards,
Lev

#896458#25
Date:
2020-01-05 15:21:38 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Lev,

thanks for your response!

El dom., 5 de ene. de 2020 a la(s) 06:21, Lev Lamberov
(dogsleg@debian.org) escribió:

Not problem!

Yes, I am still interest in helping with SWI-Prolog. Maybe I could start for the
bugs open?

thanks!
cheers,
Emmanuel

#896458#30
Date:
2020-01-05 16:24:21 UTC
From:
To:
Thanks for your response, Emmanuel!

Вс 05 янв 2020 @ 12:21 Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com>:

Great! Bugs triaging would be helpful.

Cheers!
Lev

#896458#35
Date:
2020-10-16 03:06:53 UTC
From:
To:
Hello all. If there is still interest in needing co-maintenance on this
package, I would be willing to help.

#896458#40
Date:
2020-10-16 15:57:45 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Brett,

yes, there is still an interest in help with swi-prolog in Debian.

What do you plan to do? If you're not quite sure for now, you can start
by triaging bugs reported to Debian BTS. But honestly, there are not so
much of them.

Cheers!
Lev

#896458#45
Date:
2020-10-16 23:40:02 UTC
From:
To:
Lev Lamberov <dogsleg@debian.org> writes:

Hi Lev,

I was hoping to help keep it upto date, and triage any bugs against it.
Additionally, I was able to get SWIPL to build reproducibly when I
packaged it for GNU Guix (where I also maintain SWIPL), and was wanting
to be able to do the same for Debian.

#896458#50
Date:
2020-10-17 07:55:52 UTC
From:
To:
Пт 16 окт 2020 @ 18:40 Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>:

OK, I see. Reproducibility is indeed a very nice feature. So, looking
forward to your patches.

Cheers!
Lev