node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin is dead since 1.5 years, already carries a
patch to not actually use node-uglifyjs but node-terser, and terser will
soon see a major backwards-incompatible change that will require even
more custom hacks.

It seems this package has only one reverse dependency (webpack) and two
reverse build-dependencies (node-chai and node-webpack).

Seems it is time to replace this package with its successor,
https://github.com/webpack-contrib/terser-webpack-plugin

Setting severity to serious due to the upcoming breaking change to
node-terser.


 - Jonas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=9occ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 21:30:41 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> wrote:
 > It seems this package has only one reverse dependency (webpack) and
two
 > reverse build-dependencies (node-chai and node-webpack).
 >
 > Seems it is time to replace this package with its successor,
 > https://github.com/webpack-contrib/terser-webpack-plugin

We will need to package this first.

 > Setting severity to serious due to the upcoming breaking change to
 > node-terser.

We can replace it after bullseye.

Since this does not affect bullseye, we should ignore this for bullseye.

Since Praveen says he wants to replace the package *after* bullseye,
it's probably fine to downgrade this bug to "Important" and not have it
as an RC bug before the release. Therefore, downgrading it.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Le 10/03/2021 à 11:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :

Hi,

release team said it will be ignored for bullseye

Cheers,
Xavier

On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 22:46:42 +0100 Yadd <yadd@debian.org> wrote:
 > Le 10/03/2021 à 11:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
 > > Since Praveen says he wants to replace the package *after*
bullseye,
 > > it's probably fine to downgrade this bug to "Important" and not
have it
 > > as an RC bug before the release. Therefore, downgrading it.
 > >
 > > Cheers,
 > >
 > > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
 >
 > Hi,
 >
 > release team said it will be ignored for bullseye

Bumping severity to serious. We already have node-terser-webpack-plugin
in the archive.

reverse-depends -b node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin
Reverse-Build-Depends
* node-axios
* q2-demux
* q2-taxa
* shaarli

So once these packages replace their build dependencies, we can request
removal of this package.

Dear submitter,

as the package node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1014270

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)