#983035 Missing dependency on dbus-x11

Package:
xfce4
Source:
xfce4
Submitter:
"Francesco P. Lovergine"
Date:
2022-01-13 08:51:03 UTC
Severity:
normal
#983035#5
Date:
2021-02-18 13:18:26 UTC
From:
To:
I found a missing dependency on /usr/bin/dbus-launch (dbus-x11) in bullseye, somewhere.
Not sure this is an xfce4 issue specifically, feel free to reassign to another proper package.

In order to replicate the problem: I just installed from scratch a bullseye current image
(debian/testing64) in vagrant, with virtualbox provider, an upgraded it.  Then
installed xfce4i (the metapackage) and started lightdm. After that, the user
cannot login and start a session due to missing dbus-launch, with appropriate
message at screen. Installing dbus-x11 solves the problem.

#983035#10
Date:
2022-01-13 06:06:29 UTC
From:
To:
Francesco,

Is dbus-user-session installed?
xfce4-session recommends dbus-user-session, so
it SHOULD already be installed.


Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

dbus-launch (from "dbus-x11") package is the Old Way,
which is still attempted as a fallback.

Most systemd linux systems will instead use libpam-systemd to set up the user dbus session.
In this case, dbus-launch is not used.

You can see this in the source code -- if there's already a dbus
session (usually created by systemd), it just returns immediately.

https://sources.debian.org/src/xfce4-session/4.16.0-1/xfce4-session/main.c/#L275-L278

This is encoded in the control file like this:

https://sources.debian.org/src/xfce4-session/4.16.0-1/debian/control/#L31

On a Debian GNU/Linux architecture, that
will default to the systemd path (dbus-user-session).
Where systemd isn't available (e.g. Debian GNU/kFreeBSD),
it falls back to dbus-x11 (dbus-launch).

See also

https://sources.debian.org/src/xfce4-session/4.16.0-1/debian/changelog/#L37-L38
https://bugs.debian.org/836062

#983035#15
Date:
2022-01-13 08:03:53 UTC
From:
To:
As explained this is a bug found casually while using testing64, at the stage
of its development in that date, by installing xfce4 (the meta-package) after
a base system installation (i.e. without any desktop task installed).

I have no idea if currently this isssue is still present, but I think
it could be reproduced as detailed, something I could eventually try again
in a nearest future.