Package name : et Version : 6.1.4 Upstream Author : Jason Gauci <jgmath2000@gmail.com> URL : https://eternalterminal.dev/ License : Apache Programming Lang: C++ Description : Eternal Terminal (ET) is a remote shell that automatically reconnects without interrupting the session. Eternal Terminal (ET) is a remote shell that automatically reconnects without interrupting the session. ET is used by tens of thousands of developers worldwide as a replacement for ssh in cases where people expect network disruption, such as when developing on a laptop or with unreliable Internet. ET is already in Fedora and other package managers. I maintain it myself and have automated much of the release process using docker and vagrant. FreeBSD, OpenSUSE, and some other flavors are maintained by others.
mosh?
Mosh is a popular alternative to ET. While mosh provides the same core functionality as ET, it does not support native scrolling nor tmux control mode (tmux -CC).
Control: forcemerge 865881 985189 There is already an ITP for this package, merging the two bugs. https://bugs.debian.org/865881
(further context: I have seen debian/control in the debian branch https://github.com/MisterTea/EternalTerminal/blob/debian/debian/control ) I think that `Section: universe/net` is an Ubuntu thing. Debian version would probably be "main", not "universe" ( https://github.com/MisterTea/EternalTerminal/blob/debian/debian/control#L2 ) Groeten Geert Stappers P.S. Nice to see that you also have a ubuntu branch. https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/ didn't tell _me_ it clearly, but you figured out that it does support multiple vendors.
Hello, Jason Gauci, le dim. 14 mars 2021 04:38:27 +0000, a ecrit: It would be useful to add the difference with mosh: " While mosh provides the same core functionality as ET, it does not support native scrolling nor tmux control mode (tmux -CC). " Samuel
Sure, happy to add that to the description of the package.
Jason Gauci <jgmath2000@gmail.com> writes: Hi, Might it be sensible to consider the full name "eternalterminal" (or "eternal-terminal") for this package? This would take pressure off the two-letter package name space, without giving up much (any?) discoverability.
I'm fine with changing the name.