Some locales (e.g. potentially obscure locales used by reprotest) may cause sort order issues in embedded strings in some of the grub-*.bin binaries. The attached patch fixes this by exporting LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 from debian/rules. There are still several other outstanding issues affecting the reproducibility of grub2, but this should help reduce the differences to troubleshoot the remaining issues. Thanks for maintaining grub2! live well, vagrant
Dear Maintainer, Vagrant, I'm not 100% confident, but I believe that this bug may have been fixed upstream as part of a subsequent release. I don't find any clearly locale-related differences when comparing the current output of the comparative builds[1] of grub2 in the Reproducible Builds test infrastructure for Debian. The upstream commit that I think is the most likely candidate to have fixed the problem is this one: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=grub.git;a=commit;h=f42266a8a2a4215e4ffe419b8092bdf9ced33e8e ...but I haven't tested / confirmed that. Regards, James [1] - https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/grub2.html
I would be very pleasantly surprised... The locales tested in the test infrastructure do not trigger the issue. Current versions of reprotest no longer randomizes locales and defaults to testing using the et_EE.UTF-8 locale (which also does not trigger the issue), but I seem to recall one of these *not* UTF-8 locales that was the trigger: ru_RU.CP1251 kk_KZ.RK1048 Current reprotest allows specifying the locale to test: reprotest --vary=+locales,locales.locale=kk_KZ.RK1048 With all those caveats, this is definitely a very minor issue (even moreso than when originally filed due to changes in reprotest), although easily worked around by always specifying the C.UTF-8 locale from debian/rules. That seems only related to the C or C.UTF-8 locales, so seems unlikely to fix the issue... live well, vagrant
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024, 03:40 Vagrant Cascadian < vagrant@reproducible-builds.org> wrote: Ok, that likely explains it. I'll run the reprotest variations you suggested (ideally both without, and then with, the patch applied) soon to confirm that. Thanks! James