Are there any other users who can confirm
https://github.com/ice-wm/icewm/issues/62 ?

Hallo,
* 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [Mon, Oct 18 2021, 03:42:00AM]:

I have no idea what you mean and this is definitively not "grave". Tried
to reproduce with different settings and chromium 93.0.4577.82-1 and it
just works.

Maybe some issue with other software on your system which is
manipulating properties?

Maybe gijsbers finds something. Does it work if you downgrade icewm (and
icewm-common) to the Testing version?

Best regards,
Eduard.

EB> I have no idea what you mean and this is definitively not "grave". Tried

I was thinking because it caused other packages to not work properly...

EB> to reproduce with different settings and chromium 93.0.4577.82-1 and it
EB> just works.

EB> Maybe some issue with other software on your system which is
EB> manipulating properties?

Well I turned off picom and it didn't help.

EB> Maybe gijsbers finds something.

I don't know. I think he is saying this bug is not possible:
https://github.com/ice-wm/icewm/issues/62#issuecomment-933694736

Does it work if you downgrade icewm (and
EB> icewm-common) to the Testing version?

They are the same:
# apt-cache policy icewm icewm-common
icewm:
  Installed: 2.8.0-1
  Candidate: 2.8.0-1
  Version table:
 *** 2.8.0-1 990
        990 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
icewm-common:
  Installed: 2.8.0-1
  Candidate: 2.8.0-1
  Version table:
 *** 2.8.0-1 990
        990 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Should I go further back?