#997089 libreoffice: FTBFS: segfault in '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/instdir/sdk/examples/java/Inspector' #997089
- Package:
- src:libreoffice
- Source:
- libreoffice
- Submitter:
- Lucas Nussbaum
- Date:
- 2025-09-28 09:49:09 UTC
- Severity:
- minor
- Tags:
Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/10/23/libreoffice_7.2.2-1_unstable.log A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
[ sorry for the late answer, needed to get a new laptop as the battery broke badly.. ] Hi, Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Jup. Seeing this in a master build, too :( Incidentially this worked fine until the day before you filed the bugreport. Also interestingly, in a clean chroot the odk-build-examples-java test (which does the exact thing as above) _does_ pass.. Regards, Rene
[ sorry for the late answer, needed to get a new laptop as the battery broke badly.. ] Hi, Am 23.10.21 um 18:41 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Jup. Seeing this in a master build, too :( Incidentially this worked fine until the day before you filed the bugreport. Also interestingly, in a clean chroot the odk-build-examples-java test (which does the exact thing as above) _does_ pass.. Regards, Rene
Hi again, Am 28.10.21 um 18:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: And interestingly, (after rm'ing the stale unopkg lockfile..) it passed. Also after a new attempt with manual $ make clean && make subsequencheck in odk worked, too. Just looks like a flaky test... (Even though I saw it the first time here with this report..) Regards, Rene
Hi, Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: And since then various test build on my laptop, both 7.3 and 7.2 worked, as did it on the buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=all (alpha1-1 was a other breakage fixed in -2, -2 failed for an other reason) https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=amd64 https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=arm64 Can we close this? Regards, Rene
Hi, Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: And since then various test build on my laptop, both 7.3 and 7.2 worked, as did it on the buildd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=all (alpha1-1 was a other breakage fixed in -2, -2 failed for an other reason) https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=amd64 https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=arm64 Can we close this? Regards, Rene
Hi, If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but keep it open, so that another bug does not get opened in future rebuilds. Lucas
Hi, Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: I don't really like this. I don't like open bugs which definitely will never get attention. Sure? A minor bug will be looked at when looking at rebuilds? Important and even normal is too much here even. Regards, Rene
At least by me, yes, since I look at bugs based on string matches in the bug titles (ftbfs, build, etc.) Lucas
severity 997089 minor thanks Am 03.11.21 um 17:27 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: Let's do that then. Regards, Rene
Dear submitter, as the package libreoffice has just been removed from the Debian archive experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1069123 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Humanitarian Grant of 1.5M for you. Reply for claims
Madame, Monsieur, Malgré nos précédents contrôles comptables, nous constatons à ce jour que le règlement du loyer du mois de septembre demeure en attente. Nous vous saurions gré de bien vouloir nous transmettre sans délai le justificatif de paiement ou la quittance correspondante, afin de procéder à la régularisation de votre situation.À défaut de retour rapide de votre part, nous serons contraints d'engager les démarches nécessaires au recouvrement de cette somme. Nous vous rappelons par ailleurs que nos coordonnées bancaires ont récemment été modifiées.Ces nouvelles références doivent impérativement être utilisées pour tout paiement à venir, notamment celui du loyer du mois d'octobre.Tout règlement effectué sur l’ancien RIB ne pourra être validé. Si vous ne disposez pas encore de ce RIB actualisé, nous vous invitons à en faire la demande dans les meilleurs délais. 📩 Contact – Service Comptabilité : comptabilite_gestion_locative@outlook.com Nous vous remercions de votre diligence et restons à votre entière disposition pour tout complément d’information. Dans l’attente de votre régularisation,Veuillez agréer, Madame, Monsieur, l’expression de nos salutations distinguées. Le Service Comptabilité – Gestion Locative